Page 1 of 1
Should the father be subject to disciplinary action?
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:40 pm
by steve-e
On CNN there is this recording of a child directing traffic at JFK airport. It sounds to me like it was all very under control and posed no risk to anybody, but I'm no air traffic controller
Have a listen.
http://www.cnn.com/2010/TRAVEL/03/03/air.traffic.child/" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;
Re: Should the father be subject to disciplinary action?
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:00 pm
by Bob B
Just been on ITN News ...
Re: Should the father be subject to disciplinary action?
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:16 pm
by long legs
herd it on the radio today
, no harm done me thinks
, infact some of the pilots that didnt sound over the alcohol limit sounded like they enjoyed a change of voice
, i'm fairly sure the kid would of been supervised
Re: Should the father be subject to disciplinary action?
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 11:04 pm
by steve-e
Has to be the first poll on here yet where the banana isn't winning
Re: Should the father be subject to disciplinary action?
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 2:34 pm
by 666
its obvious that permission to take off was already in place and the kid was only voicing the words and not taking decisions,and also under great supervision,although breaking rules NO PROBLEM
Re: Should the father be subject to disciplinary action?
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 5:26 pm
by artieb
my opinion kids should not be allowed in there in the first place. nor in pubs