Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:23 pm
More
Page 1 of 2
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:33 pm
A few more
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:35 pm
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:36 pm
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Sun Jun 20, 2010 11:38 pm
- P6200181.JPG (37.9 KiB) Viewed 4211 times
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 7:15 am
Nice pics Richard. What's with the rear exit passengers then ???????????
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 8:11 am
I was thinking that myself yesterday.
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:10 am
never understood why some of the vintage boys rear exit.
Must be laziness.
doesn't look right.
Must be laziness.
doesn't look right.
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 9:13 am
Not only does it not look "right" but is it allowed under their rules or even within the spirit of classic/vintage racing???
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:03 pm
Rear exit = lazy! and extremely dangerous! As Bob says looks wrong and is not within the 'spirit' at all.
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:27 pm
The vintage boys are allowed to rear exit as it was done in the day, the classic club dont allow it, surely its no more dangerous than f1 and f2 boys doing it at over twice the speed?
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:30 pm
I can't see how it is dangerous?
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 1:37 pm
No, not dangerous Steve IMHO but not cricket nonetheless 
Re: Cadwell 20th June 2
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:02 pm
Not dangerous??? Look where the passengers feet are in relation to the rear wheel - can see a foot getting caught or similar?
Posted: Mon Jun 21, 2010 2:57 pm
You don't have the rule that we do where that should be covered down to the platform then? A few do have the wheel covered down to the platform, Mostly the front exit ones lol