Just found this, if we think it's right I'll make it a sticky on here.
1. You can make a photograph of anything and anyone on any public property, except where a specific law prohibits it.
i.e. streets, sidewalks, town squares, parks, government buildings open to the public, and public libraries.
2. You may shoot on private property if it is open to the public, but you are obligated to stop if the owner requests it.
i.e. malls, retail stores, restaurants, banks, and office building lobbies.
3. Private property owners can prevent photography ON their property, but not photography OF their property from a public location.
4. Anyone can be photographed without consent when they are in a public place unless there is a reasonable expectation of privacy.
i.e. private homes, restrooms, dressing rooms, medical facilities, and phone booths.
5. Despite common misconceptions, the following subjects are almost always permissible:
* accidents, fire scenes, criminal activities
* children, celebrities, law enforcement officers
* bridges, infrastructure, transportation facilities
* residential, commercial, and industrial buildings
6. Security is rarely an acceptable reason for restricting photography. Photographing from a public place cannot infringe on trade secrets, nor is it terrorist activity.
7. Private parties cannot detain you against your will unless a serious crime was committed in their presence. Those that do so may be subject to criminal and civil charges.
8. It is a crime for someone to threaten injury, detention, confiscation, or arrest because you are making photographs.
9. You are not obligated to provide your identity or reason for photographing unless questioned by a law enforcement officer and state law requires it.
10. Private parties have no right to confiscate your equipment without a court order. Even law enforcement officers must obtain one unless making an arrest. No one can force you to delete photos you have made.
These are general guidelines regarding the right to make photos and should not be interpreted as legal advice. If you need legal help, please contact a lawyer.
Photographers Rights
- steve-e
- Site Admin
- Posts: 8921
- Joined: Wed Jun 14, 2006 6:12 pm
- D/P/T/M/S: resting Passenger
- Full Name: Steve English
- Skype contact: steveenglish.com
- Twitter: @steveinmarden
- Location: Marden, Kent
- Contact:
Photographers Rights
IF YOU'VE FORGOTTEN YOUR LOGIN EMAIL ME, WE ARE GOING BACK TO BEING LOGGED IN TO READ.
steve@steveenglish.com subject:login and whatever details you remember
steve@steveenglish.com subject:login and whatever details you remember
-
- Fired Up
- Posts: 33
- Joined: Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:23 pm
- D/P/T/M/S: Passenger
- Location: Cambridgeshire
- Contact:
Re: Photographers Rights
Just a minor thing that is a US thing.. It is very slightly different here... as photographing can be deemed a terrorist activity by a convoluted route not the direct one they claim!
Clowns to the Left Jokers to the right idiots over the top!
- Rab
- One Lap Completed
- Posts: 99
- Joined: Thu Sep 24, 2009 1:30 am
- D/P/T/M/S: T
- Full Name: richard glover
- Location: Melton Mowbray
- Contact:
Re: Photographers Rights
there is a UK photographers rights in this link:
http://www.sirimo.co.uk/2009/05/14/uk-p ... rights-v2/
they seem to be pretty much the same as the bullet points
http://www.sirimo.co.uk/2009/05/14/uk-p ... rights-v2/
they seem to be pretty much the same as the bullet points