Something is Ailing Sidecars that isn't related to racing in general. What is it?
Posted: Thu Mar 31, 2016 9:31 am
The following posts have been taken from the Emra thread in the Timekeepers section here:- viewtopic.php?f=66&t=55968
I just thought I'd pop a few of the posts over here as Steve E commented that it was hard to find as it wasn't where he expected.
Hands up, a couple of my comments are harsh, perhaps too harsh but I have left them unedited as I hate it when anyone else does that thing where they go back and modify what they said at a later date.
--------------------------------------------------------- Dave Stewart wrote:-
The outfits are out there and bike racing is in the best place it has been for many years.
We (Thundersport GB) are at Donington Park this weekend and we have 374 entries - yes, that's right 374 entries. We had well over 300 at Brands Hatch a few weeks ago in some of the most miserable conditions I can remember.
If sidecar racing is struggling (which it is) there is something wrong with Sidecar Racing that isn't ailing the rest of bike racing.
You can blame the reliance on production based bikes if you like, but that isn't the reason. Real racing bikes - 2 strokes etc - make up a tiny fraction of the solos racing today, yet this hasn't adversely affected the entry levels.
Solo racers face the same scenarios of nobody using bikes as a primary means of transport anymore, yet our part of the sport is booming!
The problem (in my mind) is that mainstream organisers have turned their backs on sidecars because they are unreliable (entry wise, not mechanically - but you could add that into the mix if you wanted to), have huge chips on their shoulders (the whole world is against us), fail to stick together (even though they often claim to all be united under the FSRA banner), are slaves to the vagaries of the TT (as Alan Richardson says - don't go!) and think that the world owes them a guaranteed place - centre stage - at a discounted or free price.
I daresay most of you don't like that assessment, but it doesn't mean that it isn't 100% accurate.
-------------------------------------------
My crowd this weekend (over 3,000 people) won't see a sidecar, or get to talk to a sidecar person.
They won't see the teamwork aspect of bike racing that only sidecars have - on track.
They won't be able to wander into a sidecar racers awning and have a chat with some of the most interesting, entertaining and hospitable members of the world of bike racing.
They won't be able to be inspired by the innovational engineering solutions that sidecar builders have had to invent.
They won't do any of the above, because the sidecars aren't there! - I find that more than a little sad, because a lot of my friends are sidecar people.
You think that you've moved on to a better place.
You could say - pretend actually - that the sidecars have a much wider audience now that they are at BSB and that they get all of the above in a much more populated paddock.
SO WHY ARE THERE LESS PEOPLE RACING SIDECARS THAN THERE WERE IN 2009????
It's because those people milling around your awning aren't interested in anything that isn't a Superbike, they're just marking time until the next race.
Ask around the other support classes, they'll tell you the same thing.
16 KTMs??? Why?
2 125 GPs? Why?
18 Moriwakis? Why?
Because they're not Superbikes - and nor are you!
You are pandering to the wrong audience and it's going to kill off three-wheeled racing.
-------------------------
Again, you won't like that assessment, but I think you'll find that if you look back on it in a couple of years it will be accurate.
20 years ago, every club that ran ACU Permitted events ran sidecars as part of their format.
BEMSEE
NEW ERA
North Gloucs
Retford
EMRA
North East MCC
Louth & Distict
Pegasus MCC
Derby Phoenix
Wirral 100
Crewe & Nantwich
KRC
Triumph Owners
CRMC
VMCC
Auto 66
A1 MCC
Marshals North West
Aberaman MCC
Port Talbot MCC
Aintree MCC
Tonfanau RR
Cheshire Centre
Newmarket Combine
Bantam Motor Cycle Club
Clubmans Racing
Melville Club
Kirkaldy Club
Astra MCC
The ones in bold still run sidecars most of the time. The rest don't.
The most successful organiser today - by numbers and public exposure (Thundersport GB)
& 3rd largest by numbers (No Limits Racing)
clubs currently organising events, don't cater for sidecars, because they aren't viable economically or promotionally.
Where do you think you are going to recruit the next generation of sidecar racers from?
If you look at the entry lists of the Clubmans events you have been discussing, you will see that over half of the entry lists are just testing or having a shakedown for something else, so where does that leave the clubs for the rest of the season?
The FSRA have a lot to answer for "It is unique in being the only body that represents a road race class to the sports governing bodies from club level to World Championship level, liaising with motorcycle road race clubs, often on behalf of the riders, and over this time has been instrumental in forming the rules and technical regulations for the latest sidecar classes." That is part of its mission statement.
I did the Daily Telegraph crossword today and the answer to 1 across was "bullcarp"
Sometimes I despair!
Too direct? - Moderate it then..................
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce Moore replied:-
As someone who has supported EMRA over the years , and someone that this year is having the opertunity to ride again after a 10 yr break , I think personally it's the sheer cost, I am racing in the pre injection champs this year , when I got the entry forms I sh*t breeze blocks , how can the average person race two weekends apart paying £275 per meeting just to enter !! , the cost factor alone must put people off , let's face it, mallorys been ruined since Edwinas was put in(my opinion ) I loved the place, but £170 entry just to get dizzy is madness
As for Dave, you've done wonders mate , pleased things are good , as for FSRA, they are trying damn hard to make things work, we have some off the best sidecar races in the world , just ashame people are allowed to see it
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Stewart replied:-
Hi Bruce, I totally get the cost issue for ordinary blokes on an ordinary wage, but that doesn't explain why solos (who are individuals rather than two people sharing the costs) are queuing out of the door ready to race and sidecars aren't. A modern GP1 or 600 Supersport is every bit as expensive to race as a sidecar - maybe even more so.
Some of my comments may seem harsh, but you know that is born of frustration because I really think sidecars make a race meeting better (and the people are generally great to have around).
My main point was:- Something is ailing sidecars that isn't related to racing in general. What is it?
That would probably be a good title for a whole new thread.
10 years ago there were more sidecars racing than there are today.
By contrast
10 years ago there were less solos racing than there are today.
Entry Fees and other costs DO NOT explain that difference.
Perhaps it is accessibility, promotion, networking, failure at World level or something else entirely.
Why do you never see Sidecars organisations (I don't want to unfairly single out the FSRA because others are capable) with their own stands at the NEC Motorcycle Show? Every sidecar I have ever seen there (and I haven't seen many) was piggy backing on someone elses stand and that means it's very hard to promote something in your own way.
The Val de Vienne training camp proves that Sidecar track days could be viable, so why has nobody organised one? That is a key feeder to solo racing.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Steve English replied:-
We're talking about getting racing going again and you want people to develop their own bikes? I don't see that being the future of getting people on the grid. Look at solos.. here DS can help us as he knows it inside out.. which classes work best? Production based but alter it a bit to make it racey (let's face it, sidecars will need a bit of altering like an extra wheel to begin with) , more tuned or out and out race prototypes? Even the TT Senior now has more superstock than it does real superbikes let along prototypes (most are just their superstock bikes with proper tyres and the ignition box changed - if that).
I don't see that filling grids Ian, no matter how great it would be to see.
Wish I'd found this thread earlier but I've had other 'offsite' issues to deal with
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, there it is. There are other posts in there too, but it exceeded my word count allowance to copy them all over.
The question that popped out though - by accident - is the title of this topic.
Apologies if some of my comments were indeed too harsh, but I'd had two pints when I wrote the first bit and being a Southern Shandy Drinker it may have affected my decorum a bit.
I just thought I'd pop a few of the posts over here as Steve E commented that it was hard to find as it wasn't where he expected.
Hands up, a couple of my comments are harsh, perhaps too harsh but I have left them unedited as I hate it when anyone else does that thing where they go back and modify what they said at a later date.
--------------------------------------------------------- Dave Stewart wrote:-
The outfits are out there and bike racing is in the best place it has been for many years.
We (Thundersport GB) are at Donington Park this weekend and we have 374 entries - yes, that's right 374 entries. We had well over 300 at Brands Hatch a few weeks ago in some of the most miserable conditions I can remember.
If sidecar racing is struggling (which it is) there is something wrong with Sidecar Racing that isn't ailing the rest of bike racing.
You can blame the reliance on production based bikes if you like, but that isn't the reason. Real racing bikes - 2 strokes etc - make up a tiny fraction of the solos racing today, yet this hasn't adversely affected the entry levels.
Solo racers face the same scenarios of nobody using bikes as a primary means of transport anymore, yet our part of the sport is booming!
The problem (in my mind) is that mainstream organisers have turned their backs on sidecars because they are unreliable (entry wise, not mechanically - but you could add that into the mix if you wanted to), have huge chips on their shoulders (the whole world is against us), fail to stick together (even though they often claim to all be united under the FSRA banner), are slaves to the vagaries of the TT (as Alan Richardson says - don't go!) and think that the world owes them a guaranteed place - centre stage - at a discounted or free price.
I daresay most of you don't like that assessment, but it doesn't mean that it isn't 100% accurate.
-------------------------------------------
My crowd this weekend (over 3,000 people) won't see a sidecar, or get to talk to a sidecar person.
They won't see the teamwork aspect of bike racing that only sidecars have - on track.
They won't be able to wander into a sidecar racers awning and have a chat with some of the most interesting, entertaining and hospitable members of the world of bike racing.
They won't be able to be inspired by the innovational engineering solutions that sidecar builders have had to invent.
They won't do any of the above, because the sidecars aren't there! - I find that more than a little sad, because a lot of my friends are sidecar people.
You think that you've moved on to a better place.
You could say - pretend actually - that the sidecars have a much wider audience now that they are at BSB and that they get all of the above in a much more populated paddock.
SO WHY ARE THERE LESS PEOPLE RACING SIDECARS THAN THERE WERE IN 2009????
It's because those people milling around your awning aren't interested in anything that isn't a Superbike, they're just marking time until the next race.
Ask around the other support classes, they'll tell you the same thing.
16 KTMs??? Why?
2 125 GPs? Why?
18 Moriwakis? Why?
Because they're not Superbikes - and nor are you!
You are pandering to the wrong audience and it's going to kill off three-wheeled racing.
-------------------------
Again, you won't like that assessment, but I think you'll find that if you look back on it in a couple of years it will be accurate.
20 years ago, every club that ran ACU Permitted events ran sidecars as part of their format.
BEMSEE
NEW ERA
North Gloucs
Retford
EMRA
North East MCC
Louth & Distict
Pegasus MCC
Derby Phoenix
Wirral 100
Crewe & Nantwich
KRC
Triumph Owners
CRMC
VMCC
Auto 66
A1 MCC
Marshals North West
Aberaman MCC
Port Talbot MCC
Aintree MCC
Tonfanau RR
Cheshire Centre
Newmarket Combine
Bantam Motor Cycle Club
Clubmans Racing
Melville Club
Kirkaldy Club
Astra MCC
The ones in bold still run sidecars most of the time. The rest don't.
The most successful organiser today - by numbers and public exposure (Thundersport GB)
& 3rd largest by numbers (No Limits Racing)
clubs currently organising events, don't cater for sidecars, because they aren't viable economically or promotionally.
Where do you think you are going to recruit the next generation of sidecar racers from?
If you look at the entry lists of the Clubmans events you have been discussing, you will see that over half of the entry lists are just testing or having a shakedown for something else, so where does that leave the clubs for the rest of the season?
The FSRA have a lot to answer for "It is unique in being the only body that represents a road race class to the sports governing bodies from club level to World Championship level, liaising with motorcycle road race clubs, often on behalf of the riders, and over this time has been instrumental in forming the rules and technical regulations for the latest sidecar classes." That is part of its mission statement.
I did the Daily Telegraph crossword today and the answer to 1 across was "bullcarp"
Sometimes I despair!
Too direct? - Moderate it then..................
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Bruce Moore replied:-
As someone who has supported EMRA over the years , and someone that this year is having the opertunity to ride again after a 10 yr break , I think personally it's the sheer cost, I am racing in the pre injection champs this year , when I got the entry forms I sh*t breeze blocks , how can the average person race two weekends apart paying £275 per meeting just to enter !! , the cost factor alone must put people off , let's face it, mallorys been ruined since Edwinas was put in(my opinion ) I loved the place, but £170 entry just to get dizzy is madness
As for Dave, you've done wonders mate , pleased things are good , as for FSRA, they are trying damn hard to make things work, we have some off the best sidecar races in the world , just ashame people are allowed to see it
-------------------------------------------------------------------- Dave Stewart replied:-
Hi Bruce, I totally get the cost issue for ordinary blokes on an ordinary wage, but that doesn't explain why solos (who are individuals rather than two people sharing the costs) are queuing out of the door ready to race and sidecars aren't. A modern GP1 or 600 Supersport is every bit as expensive to race as a sidecar - maybe even more so.
Some of my comments may seem harsh, but you know that is born of frustration because I really think sidecars make a race meeting better (and the people are generally great to have around).
My main point was:- Something is ailing sidecars that isn't related to racing in general. What is it?
That would probably be a good title for a whole new thread.
10 years ago there were more sidecars racing than there are today.
By contrast
10 years ago there were less solos racing than there are today.
Entry Fees and other costs DO NOT explain that difference.
Perhaps it is accessibility, promotion, networking, failure at World level or something else entirely.
Why do you never see Sidecars organisations (I don't want to unfairly single out the FSRA because others are capable) with their own stands at the NEC Motorcycle Show? Every sidecar I have ever seen there (and I haven't seen many) was piggy backing on someone elses stand and that means it's very hard to promote something in your own way.
The Val de Vienne training camp proves that Sidecar track days could be viable, so why has nobody organised one? That is a key feeder to solo racing.
--------------------------------------------------------------- Steve English replied:-
We're talking about getting racing going again and you want people to develop their own bikes? I don't see that being the future of getting people on the grid. Look at solos.. here DS can help us as he knows it inside out.. which classes work best? Production based but alter it a bit to make it racey (let's face it, sidecars will need a bit of altering like an extra wheel to begin with) , more tuned or out and out race prototypes? Even the TT Senior now has more superstock than it does real superbikes let along prototypes (most are just their superstock bikes with proper tyres and the ignition box changed - if that).
I don't see that filling grids Ian, no matter how great it would be to see.
Wish I'd found this thread earlier but I've had other 'offsite' issues to deal with
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
So, there it is. There are other posts in there too, but it exceeded my word count allowance to copy them all over.
The question that popped out though - by accident - is the title of this topic.
Apologies if some of my comments were indeed too harsh, but I'd had two pints when I wrote the first bit and being a Southern Shandy Drinker it may have affected my decorum a bit.